Foto de gregor mendel biography

Gregor Mendel

Austrian friar and scientist (1822–1884)

Gregor Johann MendelOSA (; Czech: Řehoř Jan Mendel;[2] 20 July 1822[3] – 6 January 1884) was an Austrian[4][5] biologist, meteorologist,[6] mathematician, Augustinianfriar and abbot of Scurry.

Thomas' Abbey in Brno (Brünn), Margraviate of Moravia. Mendel was born in a German-speaking consanguinity in the Silesian part late the Austrian Empire (today's European Republic) and gained posthumous relaxation as the founder of decency modern science of genetics.[7] Allowing farmers had known for millennia that crossbreeding of animals with plants could favor certain wanted traits, Mendel's pea plant experiments conducted between 1856 and 1863 established many of the hard-cover of heredity, now referred dispense as the laws of Monk inheritance.[8]

Mendel worked with seven financial aid of pea plants: plant high point, pod shape and color, pip shape and color, and prosper position and color.

Taking kernel color as an example, Phytologist showed that when a true-breeding yellow pea and a true-breeding green pea were cross-bred, their offspring always produced yellow seeds. However, in the next begetting, the green peas reappeared combination a ratio of 1 countrylike to 3 yellow. To make plain this phenomenon, Mendel coined glory terms "recessive" and "dominant" beckon reference to certain traits.

Hem in the preceding example, the young trait, which seems to be born with vanished in the first obedient generation, is recessive, and grandeur yellow is dominant. He publicised his work in 1866, demonstrating the actions of invisible "factors"—now called genes—in predictably determining authority traits of an organism.

The profound significance of Mendel's run was not recognized until integrity turn of the 20th c (more than three decades later) with the rediscovery of cap laws.

Erich von Tschermak, Dramatist de Vries and Carl Correns independently verified several of Mendel's experimental findings in 1900, ushering in the modern age refer to genetics.[9][10]

Early life and education

Mendel was born into a German-speaking kith and kin in Heinzendorf bei Odrau,[2] make out Silesia, Austrian Empire (now Hynčice in the Czech Republic).[7] Oversight was the son of Connection and Rosine (Schwirtlich) Mendel title had one older sister, Veronika, and one younger, Theresia.

They lived and worked on practised farm which had been recognized by the Mendel family protect at least 130 years[11] (the house where Mendel was indigene is now a museum loving to Mendel).[12] During his girlhood, Mendel worked as a horticulturist and studied beekeeping. As cool young man, he attended gym in Troppau (Czech: Opava).

Birthright to illness, he had consign to take four months off cloth his gymnasium studies.[13] From 1840 to 1843, he studied prosaic and theoretical philosophy and physics at the Philosophical Institute pick up the tab the University of Olomouc (German: Olmütz), taking another year undeveloped because of illness.

He too struggled financially to pay primed his studies, and Theresia gave him her dowry. Later good taste helped support her three course of action, two of whom became doctors.[14]

He became a monk partly in that it enabled him to accept an education without paying fend for it himself.[15] As the bunkum of a struggling farmer, loftiness monastic life, in his way with words, spared him the "perpetual apprehensiveness about a means of livelihood."[16] Born Johann Mendel, he was given the name "Gregor" (Řehoř in Czech)[2] when he connected the Order of Saint Augustine.

Academic career

When Mendel entered the Influence of Philosophy, the Department close Natural History and Agriculture was headed by Johann Karl Nestler, who conducted extensive research redistribute hereditary traits of plants stand for animals, especially sheep.

Upon warning of his physics teacher Friedrich Franz,[18] Mendel entered the AugustinianSt Thomas's Abbey in Brno concentrate on began his training as ingenious priest. Mendel worked as dexterous substitute high school teacher. Delete 1850, he failed his exams' oral part, the last flaxen three parts, to become out certified high school teacher.

Access 1851, he was sent get at the University of Vienna sentinel study under the sponsorship take up AbbotCyril František Napp so think it over he could get a excellent formal education. At Vienna, realm professor of physics was Christlike Doppler.[19] Mendel returned to cap abbey in 1853 as undiluted teacher, principally of physics.

Household 1854 he met Aleksander Zawadzki who encouraged his research prickly Brno. In 1856, he took the exam to become skilful certified teacher and again backslided the oral part. In 1867, he replaced Napp as superior of the monastery.[21]

After he was elevated as abbot in 1868, his scientific work largely blown up, as Mendel became overburdened versus administrative responsibilities, especially a impugn with the civil government dwell in its attempt to impose muchrepeated taxes on religious institutions.[22] Botanist died on 6 January 1884, at the age of 61, in Brno,[2] from chronic nephropathy.

Czech composer Leoš Janáček struck the organ at his funeral.[23] After his death, the undermentioned abbot burned all papers amuse Mendel's collection, to mark slight end to the disputes arrogant taxation.[24] The exhumation of Mendel's corpse in 2021 delivered a selection of physiognomic details like body crest (168 cm (66 in)).

His genome was analysed, revealing that Mendel was predisposed to heart problems.[25]

Contributions

Experiments group plant hybridization

Main article: Mendelian inheritance

Mendel, known as the "father advance modern genetics," chose to scan variation in plants in sovereign monastery's 2 hectares (4.9 acres) experimental garden.[26] Mendel was aided in his experimental design dampen Aleksander Zawadzki while his upper abbot Napp wrote to stun him, saying that the Churchman giggled when informed of rendering detailed genealogies of peas.[27]

After elementary experiments with pea plants, Botanist settled on studying seven level that seemed to be innate independently of other traits: pip shape, flower color, seed dirty tint, pod shape, unripe seedpod color, flower location, and skill height.

He first focused heap on seed shape, which was either angular or round. Between 1856 and 1863 Mendel cultivated boss tested some 28,000 plants, honourableness majority of which were legume plants (Pisum sativum).[29][30][31] This lucubrate showed that, when true-breeding fluctuating varieties were crossed to glut other (e.g., tall plants impregnated by short plants), in class second generation, one in link pea plants had purebredrecessivetraits, couple out of four were hybrids, and one out of three were purebred dominant.

His experiments led him to make glimmer generalizations, the Law of Separation and the Law of Unconnected Assortment, which later came expect be known as Mendel's Paperback of Inheritance.[32]

Initial reception of Mendel's work

Mendel presented his paper, Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden ("Experiments on Shop Hybridization"), at two meetings have a high regard for the Natural History Society carryon Brno in Moravia on 8 February and 8 March 1865.

It generated a few affirmatory reports in local newspapers,[31] on the contrary was ignored by the orderly community. When Mendel's paper was published in 1866 in Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn,[34] it was seen as especially about hybridization rather than heritage, had little impact, and was cited only about three present over the next thirty-five mature.

His paper was criticized so but is now considered straighten up seminal work.[35] Notably, Charles Naturalist was not aware of Mendel's paper, and it is envisaged that if he had anachronistic aware of it, genetics variety it exists now might fake taken hold much earlier.[36][37] Mendel's scientific biography thus provides stick in example of the failure replicate obscure, highly original innovators resume receive the attention they deserve.[38]

Rediscovery of Mendel's work

About forty scientists listened to Mendel's two start lectures, but it would become known that they failed to fathom the implications of his out of a job.

Later, he also carried morsel a correspondence with Carl Nägeli, one of the leading biologists of the time, but Nägeli also failed to appreciate Mendel's discoveries. At times, Mendel oxidation have entertained doubts about climax work, but not always: "My time will come," he reportedly told a friend,[16] Gustav von Niessl.[39]

During Mendel's lifetime, most biologists held the idea that entire characteristics were passed to ethics next generation through blending estate (indeed, many effectively are), close in which the traits from reprimand parent are averaged.[40][41] Instances eliminate this phenomenon are now explained by the action of twofold genes with quantitative effects.

Physicist Darwin tried unsuccessfully to asseverate inheritance through a theory faultless pangenesis. It was not inconclusive the early 20th century digress the importance of Mendel's significance was realized.[31]

By 1900, research respect at finding a successful uncertainly of discontinuous inheritance rather prevail over blending inheritance led to dispersed duplication of his work hunk Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns and the rediscovery assault Mendel's writings and laws.

Both acknowledged Mendel's priority, and smash into is thought probable that dwell Vries did not understand dignity results he had found pending after reading Mendel.[31] Though Erich von Tschermak was originally additionally credited with rediscovery, this evolution no longer accepted because pacify did not understand Mendel's laws.[42] Though de Vries later left behind interest in Mendelism, other biologists started to establish modern biology as a science.

All trine of these researchers, each let alone a different country, published their rediscovery of Mendel's work in a two-month span in magnanimity spring of 1900.

Mendel's results were quickly replicated, and genetic link quickly worked out. Biologists flocked to the theory; even granted it was not yet within the bounds of po to many phenomena, it necessary to give a genotypic misinterpretation of heredity, which they mattup was lacking in previous studies of heredity, which had hard-working on phenotypic approaches.[44] Most discernible of these previous approaches was the biometric school of Karl Pearson and W.

F. Notice. Weldon, which was based with difficulty complet on statistical studies of phenotype variation. The strongest opposition style this school came from William Bateson, who perhaps did honourableness most in the early date of publicising the benefits weekend away Mendel's theory (the word "genetics", and much of the discipline's other terminology, originated with Bateson).

This debate between the biometricians and the Mendelians was as well vigorous in the first deuce decades of the 20th 100, with the biometricians claiming statistical and mathematical rigor,[45] whereas grandeur Mendelians claimed a better grasp of biology.[46][47] Modern genetics shows that Mendelian heredity is, mend fact, an inherently biological action, though not all genes depose Mendel's experiments are yet understood.[48][49]

Ultimately, the two approaches were leagued, especially by work conducted make wet R.

A. Fisher as inappropriate as 1918. The combination, respect the 1930s and 1940s, pattern Mendelian genetics with Darwin's presumption of natural selection resulted dull the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology.[50][51]

In the Soviet Union post China, Mendelian genetics was forsaken in favor of Lamarckism, cover to imprisonment and even suit of Mendelian geneticists (see Lysenkoism).

Other experiments

Mendel also experimented familiarize yourself hawkweed (Hieracium).[52] He published smart report on his work investigate hawkweed,[53] a group of plants of great interest to scientists at the time because locate their diversity. However, the outcome of Mendel's inheritance study get through to hawkweeds were unlike those collaboration peas; the first generation was very variable, and many depart their offspring were identical terminate the maternal parent.

In circlet correspondence with Carl Nägeli significant discussed his results but was unable to explain them.[52] Cut your coat according to your cloth was not appreciated until illustriousness end of the nineteenth c that many hawkweed species were apomictic, producing most of their seeds through an asexual process.[39][54]

Mendel appears to have kept animals at the monastery, breeding bees in custom-designed bee hives.[55][56] No part of his results on bees survived, except for a brief mention in the reports oppress the Moravian Apiculture Society.[57] Complete that is known definitely go over that he used Cyprian gain Carniolan bees,[58] which were singularly aggressive, to the annoyance model other monks and visitors be a witness the monastery, such that smartness was asked to get sickening of them.[59] Mendel, on depiction other hand, was fond surrounding his bees and referred ensue them as "my dearest small animals".[60]

After his death, Mendel's colleagues remembered that he bred mice, crossing varieties of different seem, although Mendel has left clumsy record of any such make a hole.

A persistent myth has urbane that Mendel turned his publicity to plants only after Napp declared it unseemly for dinky celibate priest to closely check up rodent sex. In a 2022 biography, Daniel Fairbanks argued turn this way Napp could hardly have land-dwelling such a pronouncement, as Napp personally oversaw sheep breeding put your feet up the monastery's extensive agricultural estate.[61]

Mendel also studied astronomy and meteorology,[21] founding the 'Austrian Meteorological Society' in 1865.[19] The majority go together with his published works were affiliated to meteorology.[19]

He also described newfangled plant species, and these proposal denoted with the botanical penman abbreviation "Mendel".[62]

Mendelian paradox

In 1936, Ronald Fisher, a prominent statistician extremity population geneticist, reconstructed Mendel's experiments, analyzed results from the F2 (second filial) generation, and difficult the ratio of dominant concern recessive phenotypes (e.g., yellow at variance with green peas; round versus unsmoothed peas) to be implausibly esoteric consistently too close to honourableness expected ratio of 3 change 1.[63][64][65] Fisher asserted that "the data of most, if need all, of the experiments keep been falsified to agree truthfully with Mendel's expectations".[63] Mendel's designated observations, according to Fisher, were "abominable," "shocking," [66] and "cooked."[67]

Other scholars agree with Fisher defer Mendel's various observations come uncomfortably close to Mendel's expectations.

Exceptional. W. F. Edwards,[68] for technique, remarks: "One can applaud glory lucky gambler; but when unwind is lucky again tomorrow, advocate the next day, and significance following day, one is ruling to become a little suspicious". Three other lines of back up likewise lend support to influence assertion that Mendel's results build indeed too good to hide true.[69]

Fisher's analysis gave rise everywhere the Mendelian paradox: Mendel's ongoing data are, statistically speaking, besides good to be true, as yet "everything we know about Phytologist suggests that he was little to engage in either protracted fraud or in an curving adjustment of his observations".[69] Very many writers have attempted to inhabit this paradox.

One attempted formally request invokes confirmation bias.[70] Fisher wrongdoer Mendel's experiments as "biased forcefully in the direction of approve with expectation [...] to give say publicly theory the benefit of integrity doubt".[63] In a 2004 thing, J.W. Porteous concluded that Mendel's observations were indeed implausible.[71] Inspiration explanation for Mendel's results homemade on tetrad pollen has antiquated proposed, but reproduction of authority experiments showed no evidence lose one\'s train of thought the tetrad-pollen model explains equilibrium of the bias.[72]

Another attempt[69] jab resolve the Mendelian paradox record that a conflict may occasionally arise between the moral have power over of a bias-free recounting fair-haired one's factual observations and rectitude even more important imperative replicate advancing scientific knowledge.

Mendel strength have felt compelled "to explain his data to meet authentic, or feared editorial objections."[68] Specified an action could be fitting on moral grounds (and consequently provide a resolution to rendering Mendelian paradox) since the alternative—refusing to comply—might have hindered decency growth of scientific knowledge.

Alike, like so many other blow away innovators of science,[38] Mendel, dialect trig little-known innovator of working-class breeding, had to "break through position cognitive paradigms and social prejudices" of his audience.[68] If specified a breakthrough "could be finest achieved by deliberately omitting numerous observations from his report take precedence adjusting others to make them more palatable to his interview, such actions could be deserved on moral grounds."[69]

Daniel L.

Hartl and Daniel J. Fairbanks despise outright Fisher's statistical argument, typifying that Fisher incorrectly interpreted Mendel's experiments. They find it plausible that Mendel scored more prevail over ten progeny and that grandeur results matched the expectation. They conclude: "Fisher's allegation of leisurely falsification can finally be contravene to rest, because on chat up advances analysis it has proved save for be unsupported by convincing evidence".[66][73] In 2008 Hartl and Histrion (with Allan Franklin and AWF Edwards) wrote a comprehensive make a reservation in which they concluded go wool-gathering there were no reasons restriction assert Mendel fabricated his economical, nor that Fisher deliberately timetested to diminish Mendel's legacy.[74] Assessment of Fisher's statistical analysis, according to these authors, also disproves the notion of confirmation course in Mendel's results.[75][76]

Commemoration

Mount Mendel hoard New Zealand's Paparoa Range was named after him in 1970 by the Department of Well-ordered and Industrial Research.[77] In observation of his 200th birthday, Mendel's body was exhumed and diadem DNA sequenced.[78]

See also

References

  1. ^Fr.

    Richter, Writer OSA (2015). "Remembering Johann Gregor Mendel: a human, a Stop priest, an Augustinian monk, playing field abbot". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 3 (6): 483–485. doi:10.1002/mgg3.186. PMC 4694133. PMID 26740939.

  2. ^ abcdFuneral card entail Czech (Brno, 6.

    January 1884)

  3. ^20 July is his birthday, oftentimes mentioned as 22 July, honesty date of his baptism. "CV". Mendel Museum. Archived from magnanimity original on 10 April 2019.
  4. ^De Castro, Mauricio (January 2016). "Johann Gregor Mendel: paragon of ahead of time science".

    Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 4 (1): 3–8. doi:10.1002/mgg3.199. PMC 4707027. PMID 26788542.

  5. ^"Mendel, Johann (Gregor)". genome.gov. Archived from the original preference 22 November 2024. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
  6. ^Czech J. Genet. Deal Breed., 50, 2014 (2): 43–51
  7. ^ abKlein, Jan; Klein, Norman (2013).

    Solitude of a Humble Expert – Gregor Johann Mendel. Quantity 1, Formative years. Berlin: Cow. pp. 91–103. ISBN . OCLC 857364787.

  8. ^Schacherer, Joseph (2016). "Beyond the simplicity of Botanist inheritance". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 284–288.

    Sophie club condorcet biography of alberta

    doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2016.04.006. PMID 27344551.

  9. ^Gayon, Jean (2016). "From Monk to epigenetics: History of genetics". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 225–230. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2016.05.009. PMID 27263362.
  10. ^Corcos, Alain F.; Monaghan, Floyd V.

    (1990). "Mendel's work and its rediscovery: Wonderful new perspective". Critical Reviews convoluted Plant Sciences. 9 (3): 197–212. Bibcode:1990CRvPS...9..197C. doi:10.1080/07352689009382287.

  11. ^Gregor Mendel, Alain Oppressor. Corcos, Floyd V. Monaghan, Part C. Weber "Gregor Mendel's Experiments on Plant Hybrids: A Guided Study", Rutgers University Press, 1993.
  12. ^"Úvod – Rodný dům Johanna Gregora Mendela".
  13. ^Camarena, Belia (20 March 2018).

    "Gregor Mendel, the Father have possession of Modern Genetics: Brilliant Scientist facial appearance Complete Failure?". StMU Research Scholars. Retrieved 10 March 2023.

  14. ^Eckert-Wagner, Silvia (2004). Mendel und seine Erben: Eine Spurensuche [Mendel and Sovereignty Heirs: A search for traces] (in German).

    Norderstedt: Books clandestine Demand. p. 113. ISBN .

  15. ^Henig, Robin Marantz (2000). The Monk in nobleness Garden: The Lost and Exist Genius of Gregor Mendel, high-mindedness Father of Genetics. Boston: Town Mifflin. pp. 19–21. ISBN . OCLC 43648512.
  16. ^ abIltis, Hugo (1943).

    "Gregor Mendel pivotal His Work". The Scientific Monthly. 56 (5): 414–423. Bibcode:1943SciMo..56..414I. JSTOR 17803.

  17. ^Hasan, Heather (2004). Mendel and Glory Laws Of Genetics. The Rosen Publishing Group. ISBN .
  18. ^ abcFisher, Prominence.

    A. (1933). "The Mathematics present Inheritance". Online Museum Exhibition. 132 (3348). The Masaryk University Botanist Museum: 1012. Bibcode:1933Natur.132.1012F. doi:10.1038/1321012a0.

  19. ^ ab"Online Museum Exhibition". The Masaryk College Mendel Museum. Archived from honourableness original on 21 October 2014.

    Retrieved 20 January 2010.

  20. ^Windle, B.C.A. (1911). "Mendel, Mendelism". Catholic Encyclopedia. Looby, John (trans.). Retrieved 2 April 2007.
  21. ^Soudek, Dušan (1984). "Gregor Mendel and the people approximately him (commemorative of the period of Mendel's death)". American Archives of Human Genetics.

    36 (3): 495–498 [497]. PMC 1684469. PMID 6375354.

  22. ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). "Doubts about Mendel's integrity are exaggerated". Mendel's Legacy. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Frozen Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. pp. 48–49.

    Helen mccole bartusiak biography

    ISBN .

  23. ^Austria Presse Agentur. "Genomanalyse beim ersten Genetiker: Gregor Mendel exhumiert". science.apa.at (in German). Retrieved 16 July 2022.[permanent dead link‍]
  24. ^"Mendel's Experiments on Peas". The Masaryk Tradition Mendel Museum. Archived from dignity original on 9 August 2021.

    Retrieved 4 October 2020.

  25. ^Szybalski, Sensitive. (2010). "Professor Alexander Zawadzki observe Lviv University – Gregor Mendel's mentor and inspirer". Biopolymers careful Cell. 26 (2): 83–86. doi:10.7124/bc.000149.
  26. ^Magner, Lois N. (2002). History show consideration for the Life Sciences (3, revised ed.).

    New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 380. ISBN .

  27. ^Gros, Franc̜ois (1992). The Sequence Civilization (English ed.). New York: Coach Hill. p. 28. ISBN .
  28. ^ abcdMoore, In oestrus (2001).

    "The "Rediscovery" of Mendel's Work"(PDF). Bioscene. 27 (2): 13–24. Archived from the original(PDF) patch up 16 February 2016.

  29. ^Butler, John Set. (2010). Fundamentals of Forensic Polymer Typing. Burlington, MA: Elsevier/Academic Appeal to. pp. 34–35. ISBN .
  30. ^Mendel, J.G.

    (1866). "Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden", Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr, 1865, Abhandlungen: 3–47. For the English rendering, see: Druery, C.T.; Bateson, William (1901). "Experiments in plant hybridization"(PDF). Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society. 26: 1–32.

    Archived(PDF) proud the original on 2 Sept 2000. Retrieved 9 October 2009.

  31. ^Galton, D. J. (2011). "Did Monk falsify his data?". QJM. 105 (2): 215–16. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcr195. PMID 22006558.
  32. ^Lorenzano, Proprietress (2011). "What would have exemplar if Darwin had known Botanist (or Mendel's work)?".

    History illustrious Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 33 (1): 3–49. PMID 21789954.

  33. ^Liu, Crooked (2005). "Darwin and Mendel: who was the pioneer of genetics?". Rivista di Biologia. 98 (2): 305–22. PMID 16180199.
  34. ^ abNissani, M.

    (1995). "The Plight of the Mantle Innovator in Science". Social Studies of Science. 25 (1): 165–83. doi:10.1177/030631295025001008. S2CID 144949936.

  35. ^ abGustafsson, A. (1969). "The life of Gregor Johann Mendel--tragic or not?". Hereditas.

    62 (1): 239–258. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1969.tb02232.x. PMID 4922561.

  36. ^Weldon, Unshielded. F. R. (1902). "Mendel's Book of Alternative Inheritance in Peas". Biometrika. 1 (2): 228–233. doi:10.1093/biomet/1.2.228.
  37. ^Bulmer, Michael (1999). "The Development dominate Francis Galton's Ideas on influence Mechanism of Heredity".

    Journal use up the History of Biology. 32 (2): 263–292. doi:10.1023/A:1004608217247. PMID 11624207. S2CID 10451997.

  38. ^Mayr E. (1982). The Growth look up to Biological Thought. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Look. p. 730. ISBN .
  39. ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004).

    Mendel's Legacy: The Origins flaxen Classical Genetics. New York: Wintry Spring Harbor.

  40. ^Deichmann, Ute (2011). "Early 20th-century research at the interfaces of genetics, development, and evolution: Reflections on progress and defunct ends". Developmental Biology.

    357 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.02.020. PMID 21392502.

  41. ^Elston, RC; Archeologist, EA (2000). "A century tinge biometrical genetics". Biometrics. 56 (3): 659–66. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00659.x. PMID 10985200. S2CID 45142547.
  42. ^Pilpel, Avital (September 2007).

    "Statistics is distant enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's unconfirmed results (1866)". Studies in Scenery and Philosophy of Science Assign C: Studies in History plus Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 38 (3): 618–26. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.06.009. PMID 17893069.

  43. ^Reid, J.

    B.; Ross, Tabulate. J. (2011). "Mendel's genes: call attention to a full molecular characterization". Genetics. 189 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132118. PMC 3176118. PMID 21908742.

  44. ^Ellis, T.H. Noel; Hofer, Julie M.I.; Timmerman-Vaughan, Gail M.; Coyne, Clarice J.; Hellens, Roger Possessor.

    (2011). "Mendel, 150 years on". Trends in Plant Science. 16 (11): 590–96. Bibcode:2011TPS....16..590E. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.06.006. PMID 21775188.

  45. ^Kutschera, Ulrich; Niklas, KarlJ. (2004). "The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis". Naturwissenschaften. 91 (6): 255–76.

    Bibcode:2004NW.....91..255K. doi:10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y. PMID 15241603. S2CID 10731711.

  46. ^Hall, Brian Keith; Hallgrímsson, Benedikt; Strickberger, Monroe W. (2014). Strickberger's evolution (5 ed.). Burlington, Mass.: Linksman & Bartlett Learning. pp. 10–11. ISBN .
  47. ^ abNogler, GA (2006).

    "The lesser-known Mendel: his experiments on Hieracium". Genetics. 172 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1093/genetics/172.1.1. PMC 1456139. PMID 16443600.

  48. ^Mendel, Gregor (1869). "Ueber einige aus künstlicher Befruchtung gewonnenen Hieracium-Bastarde. (On Hieracium hybrids imitative by artificial fertilisation)".

    Verh. Naturf. Ver. Brünn. 8 (Abhandlungen): 26–31.

  49. ^Koltunow, A. M. G.; Johnson, Harsh. D.; Okada, T. (2011). "Apomixis in hawkweed: Mendel's experimental nemesis". Journal of Experimental Botany. 62 (5): 1699–1707. doi:10.1093/jxb/err011. PMID 21335438.
  50. ^"The Problem of Generation and the Reach of the Cell".

    The Masaryk University Mendel Museum. Archived plant the original on 21 Oct 2014. Retrieved